"Negara Republik Indonesia ini bukan milik sesuatu golongan, bukan milik sesuatu agama, bukan milik sesuatu suku, bukan milik sesuat golongan adat-istiadat, tetapi milik kita semua dari Sabang sampai Merauke!""This Republic of Indonesia is neither owned by certain groups, nor by certain religions, nor by certain tribes, nor associated to certain customs, but it is our joint property from Sabang to Merauke1" - Ir. Soekarno (1st president of Indonesia)
Being an Indonesian nowadays can be a headache. Living as a minority (in race or religion) in Indonesia today might feel like crossing a minefield. How could you not if you are one? Ahok, the renowned Jakarta governor and an influential representative of the double-minorities, has just been sentenced to a 2-year prison time for a controversial case of 'religious defamation'. It is such a bitter twist over his marvelous track record managing the capital city as he carried on Mr. President's legacy since November 2014. His outspoken and vocal style of championing a change for Jakarta has betrayed him, for once.
Pertaining to this case, social media has become an arena of either defending and dethroning the GlobeAsian's man of the year. It is hard staying neutral or level-headed in this situation if we are an avid supporter of Ahok. After all, he has done all sort of great things for Jakarta and after an unfortunate event, he needed to stand trials and now detained after questionably insulting a religious belief. With such a figure to be convicted and finally punished, an automatic conclusion is that other minorities are likely to face similar pressure and tribulations; a discouraging state to voicing out their opinions yet alone running for political positions.
Yet here is a question to reflect:
Do we support Ahok for his work ethic and performance or because he shares the same background (a Christian or a Chinese-Indonesians) as you do? In other words, if a person having different ethnic/religion with similar work ethic appears as a potential representative, would you vote for him/her?
Hopefully we are not hypocrites in our heart regarding this matter. Also note that this doesn't mean his accomplishments could exempt himself from complying to the Indonesian's law. Law is law, above whatever morale compass or religious principles we hold on to.
Here is Code's Article 156(a)2 that Ahok is claimed to violate,
Barang siapa di muka umum menyatakan perasaan permusuhan, kebencian atau penghinaan terhadap suatu atau beberapa golongan rakyat Indonesia, diancam dengan pidana penjara paling lama empat tahun atau pidana denda paling banyak empat ribu lima ratus rupiah. Perkataan golongan dalam pasal ini dan pasal berikutnya berarti tiap-tiap bagian dari rakyat Indonesia yang berbeda dengan suatu atau beberapa hagian lainnya karena ras, negeri asal, agama, tempat, asal, keturunan, kebangsaan atau kedudukan menurut hukum tata negara.
It targets those who deliberately, in public, express feelings of hostility, hatred, or contempt against religions with the purpose of preventing others from adhering to any religion, and targets those who disgrace a religion. It is difficult to believe that Ahok, a past regent of Bangka-Belitung province (99.95% of them are Muslims) who is loved by the people and have Muslim stepparents, could deliberately utter words of blasphemy against Islam. If for instance, a Muslim leader had some similar ambiguous say about others' religious beliefs, what are the odds that he/she would follow Ahok's misery?
A subtle reminder: Indonesia is founded with Pancasila as the philosophical foundation and together with the law recognize six (once five) major religions. It is still far from fully accommodating as it has not acknowledged other minor religions but it is a proof that the founding fathers held diversity of beliefs as a prominent aspect in the early days of independence. It doesn't matter that almost 90% of Indonesians embrace Islam as their beliefs; you can not say it's a Muslim country since the nation never adheres to the Shariah law. It doesn't matter that 95% of Indonesians are natives; you can not legally make life harder for the non-natives. Under the constitutions, everyone should be in the same position and not have an advantage over race or religions, just as Mr. Sukarno envisioned.
Being an Indonesian nowadays is not comfortable. To keep being an Indonesian today despite your background difference can mean defying survivability; it is not humane. To honor Indonesia in this moment of difficulties does require self-sacrifice and a hope that doesn't cease. J. F. Kennedy once said: "ask not what your country can do for you -- ask what you can do for your country.". I pray that whoever is willing to fight for social justice and welfare in Indonesia, is to fight even harder.
This is a call to arms: the battle for independence is not over yet!
This is a call to arms: the battle for independence is not over yet!
Footnotes and References:
1. Sabang and Merauke: two Indonesian cities commonly mentioned as the Westernmost and Easternmost limit of the country
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_Indonesia
1. Sabang and Merauke: two Indonesian cities commonly mentioned as the Westernmost and Easternmost limit of the country
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_Indonesia

















